LinkedIn   Twitter   Facebook   Instagram  

Get In

Open Mon - Fri
8:30 am to 5:00 pm

Stony Stratford: 01908 262680
Bicester: 01869 225580


Shared Care Orders

May 17th, 2019

Following a separation, many parents apply to Court for a child arrangements order[1] to formally set out the living arrangements for the child/children. Any person including a parent, grandparent, guardian or any other person may apply for an order in this way, as long as they have what is known as ‘parental responsibility’ for the child (or children).

The process can be fairly lengthy and involve a number of hearings, depending upon how willing the parties to the application are to resolve matters themselves. If ultimately they are unable to agree and a Judge or Bench of Magistrates is required to decide how the child arrangements should be managed, they will do so at what is called a final hearing 

Once their decision is made, the Court may frame the order in one of two ways. It could state that the child will live with one parent and ‘spend time with’ the other, or it could state that the care of the child is ‘shared’ between the parents. Either way, the order will clearly set out exactly which days the child spends where.

Whenever a Court is asked to make any decision in relation to children, the children’s welfare is its paramount concern.[2] Under section 1(3) of the Children Act 1989, the Court has a checklist of factors to consider when deciding what is in the child’s best interest, including but not limited to:

  • The wishes and feelings of the child;
  • The child’s needs; the likely effect on the child of any change in circumstances;
  • And any harm that the child has suffered or is at risk of suffering and how capable each of the parents are of meeting the child’s needs.

Presuming that the child wants to see both parents, that they are not likely to suffer any harm and both parents are equally capable of meeting their needs, in principle, there should be no reason why a shared care order would not be appropriate. An order that, in its wording, clearly states that the parents share the care of the child will often impact how the parents perceive themselves – they have been formally recognised as equal carers and so the parents may feel that this emboldens their roles as neither one of them is the ‘better’ or ‘preferred’ parent.

Until recently, a shared care order was somewhat rare and thought only to be made in exceptional circumstances. The Court considered that a child should have a settled home with one of his/her parents.[3] Now, however, there is no need for exceptional circumstances, and a shared care order can be made as long as it is in the best interests of the children.[4] It does not need to be limited to cases where the children spend equal amounts of time with each parent and can be granted no matter what the division of time is.[5] Therefore, even if the child or children spend 6 days per week with one parent and just one day with the other, those parents could still have an order expressing that the child’s care is shared between the two of them.

But what is the practical effect of having one of these orders? Other than the fact that a shared care order highlights the importance of both parents providing an equally important level of care, it also has some implications on the care of the children.

One of those implications is that, where a child arrangements order says that the child is to ‘live with’ parent number 1 and ‘spend time with’ parent number 2, parent number 1 is automatically able to take the child out of the UK, for periods of less than one month, without parent number 2’s consent. Contrastingly, where a shared care order is in force, written consent is required from every person who has parental responsibility whenever one person wishes to take the child out of the UK. So, for shared care orders, neither parent can take the child out of the UK for any period of time whatsoever unless the other parent agreed to it (or they obtained leave from the Court).

As a result, a ‘lives with’ order puts the parents on unequal footing – one needs to seek consent each time they wish to take the child out of the UK for less than one month, and the other does not – this somewhat undermines the second parent’s role and importance. Often, however, the Court will add a direction into these orders to the effect that authorisation is always given, so, if relations between the parents are really bad and one will not agree to the other taking the children away, there is no need for repeated applications to Court each time. This also goes towards levelling the playing field with regard to the imbalance that ‘lives with’ and ‘spends time with’ orders imply onto the perceived roles of the parents.

Overall, shared care orders can be hugely beneficial, symbolically, in the eyes of both parents and the children who are subject to them. The law clearly recognises this as it already moved in the right direction in 2014 when the Children and Families Act replaced what was previously known as ‘residence and contact’ orders with child arrangement orders. The former would name a ‘resident’ parent and a parent who had ‘contact’, therefore implying that only one parent should have the responsibility of the children’s home being with them. Simply calling them child arrangements orders made a huge difference.

Further, a shared care order goes even further to assist with the perception of both parents having equal importance in the upbringing of their children. This symbolism may seem minor and inconsequential where Court directions can remove any automatic, unwanted effects of a ‘lives with’ order, however, being seen as equal on paper could make a big difference to parents. For example, where a father feels that he is less important than the mother due to the traditional societal view of men’s roles as money-makers, not carers.

For legal advice as to how to go about obtaining a child arrangements order or any other family-related matter, please contact one of our specialists on 01908 262680 or by emailing We look forward to hearing from you.

[1] Section 8 of the Children Act 1989

2 Section 1(1) of the Children Act 1989

3 Re H (A Minor) (Shared Residence) [1992] 12 WLUK 2 [per Cazalet J]

4 Re D (Children) (Shared Residence Orders) [2001] 1 FLR 495

5 Re F (Shared Residence Order) [2003] EWCA Civ 592



Written by

Holly Mullen


Having recently graduated with her first class honours degree in law from the University of Bedfordshire, Holly is keen to explore her interest in Family Law. She has previously volunteered with public legal advice services and hopes to eventually qualify as a family Solicitor. Holly joined Hawkins Family Law in August 2017.

  • How Counselling Can Help with Divorce Related Stress
  • The Impact of Domestic Abuse on Decision making in Divorce
  • My cohabitee has promised me the earth. Can I rely on it?
  • Access to justice - Who needs lawyers?
  • What is legal 500?
  • Love Island – what happens next?
  • Dad Found Liable for the Cost of a Child Conceived Without His Permission
  • Pieces of Paper that make you Divorced: Decree Nisi and Decree Absolute
  • Summer Holidays
  • What Is Chambers and Partners?
  • Service Of Key Court Papers By Whatsapp
  • Is Therapy for Me?
  • What Constitutes Value?
  • F v M (Temporary Leave to Remove: Alleged Risk of Onward Abduction to Non-Hague Country)
  • Can Assets of a Parent Be Taken into Account in a CMS Calculation?
  • What is the HSSF Mark?
  • Wife’s Attempt to Appeal Arbitration Award Fails!
  • Shared Care Orders
  • Mental Health Awareness Week 2019
  • What Happens If I Make an Agreement Regarding Finances and Then Change My Mind?
  • Spousal Maintenance on Divorce – Is There A Claim?
  • Daga v Bangur [2018] EWFC 91 – Case Update
  • Common Law Marriage Is Not Changing!
  • Whose Outcome Is It?
  • In the Event of A ‘No Deal’ Brexit
  • What Constitutes Value?
  • What Is Legal 500?
  • Spring Clean your Routine
  • Mother Ordered to Return Child to Latvia
  • What Is ‘Chambers and Partners UK’?
  • Arbitration. A viable alternative?
  • Strive for stability in 2019
  • What Happens If I Make an Agreement Regarding Finances and Then Change My Mind?
  • Stacey Accredited by Resolution
  • Can Financial Claims Still Be Made Years After Divorce?
  • What Is the Difference Between A Court Order and An Undertaking?
  • Divorce or Annulment?
  • Therapy - A New Year’s resolution.
  • Cohabitation and the need for reform
  • The “Common Law Marriage myth”
  • What to think about when you are considering divorce from a financial perspective
  • Increase in IVF and Surrogacy Leads to A Decrease in Adoption Rates
  • Looking After Yourself
  • Transparency in the Family Courts
  • The Legal 500 rankings for 2018/19
  • Forced Marriage
  • What can therapy help with?
  • Chambers and Partners Ranking Released
  • Does Divorce Law Encourage Couples to Reconcile?
  • What is Resolution?
  • Asserting yourself or saying no.
  • Is Bigger Always Better?
  • McKenzie Friend
  • Prioritising Your Children’s Needs in Adverse Circumstances
  • What do I need to know if I decide to cohabit with someone?
  • High Court Judge ‘Deprecates’ Interrupting Barristers
  • Prohibited Steps Orders
  • Domestic abuse in all its forms is unacceptable
  • The Five Facts for obtaining a Divorce Part 2
  • The Five Facts for Obtaining a Divorce: Behaviour/Adultery
  • Remember and recover... Forgive and forget... - August 3rd, 2018
  • Case Law Update – Hermens v Hermans - 27th July 2018
  • Finding summer happiness July 24th 2018
  • The first women to be convicted of coercive behaviour
  • New Starter
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the 'rise of the machines'.
  • Let's remove fault based divorce - July 6th, 2018
  • Honesty really is the best policy - June 29th, 2018
  • Heterosexual Couples win right to enter into Civil Partnerships - June 27th, 2018
  • Waggott v Waggott [2018] EWCA Civ 727 - June 22th, 2018
  • Privacy and confidentiality - June 15th, 2018
  • The ongoing Russian oligarch saga - June 8th, 2018
  • Being a Trainee Solicitor - June 1st, 2018
  • 83 year old millionaire jailed for non-compliance with divorce order
  • Conduct in Financial Proceedings & The Notorious "Add-Back" Argument - May 18th, 2018
  • Mental Health Week - 14th to 20th May 2018 - May 11th, 2018
  • What can we do so I can win? - May 4th, 2018
  • New measures designed to tackle domestic abuse - April 27th, 2018
  • Can I stop the other parent of my child making an application to the court?
  • Cryptocurrencies and divorce - April 13th, 2018
  • April 6th 2018 - Spring
  • How to sleep - March 29th, 2018
  • First surrogacy guidance published for England and Wales - March 23rd, 2018
  • Feminism in Family Law Part 2 – Parents and Children - March 9th, 2018
  • Feminism in Family Law Part 1 - Ancillary Relief - March 2nd, 2018
  • Chambers & Partners - February 23rd, 2018
  • Google Depression - February 16th, 2018
  • What is a Fact-Finding Hearing? - Feburary 9th, 2018
  • Moving Forward - Feburary 2nd, 2018
  • Parental Alienation - January 26th, 2018
  • Financing a property after divorce or separation – January 19th, 2018
  • Ideas to help buy a property after divorce or separation - January 12th, 2018
  • New Year 2018 - January 5th, 2018
  • The First Step - December 29th, 2017
  • Have a considered Christmas 2017 - December 22nd, 2017
  • Who is looking after you? - December 15th, 2017
  • What is the legal 500 - December 8th, 2017
  • When the clocks go back - December 1st, 2017
  • You are the Priority - November 17th, 2017
  • Hawkins Family Law ‘Boutique family law firm that punches above its weight’ as noted by Chambers and Partners UK Guide, 2018
  • Husband installs secret cameras to record abuse from wife - November 24th, 2017
  • My spouse owns the family home - what can I do to protect my interest? Can I still live there until the divorce is finalised? - November 10th, 2017
  • Division of assets following divorce - November 3rd, 2017
  • My marriage has broken down - what do I need to do? - October 27th, 2017
  • Identifying your emotions to create change - October 20th, 2017
  • Jo Hawkins is listed in elite “ Leading Lawyers” list by The Legal 500 United Kingdom, 2017’s guide to outstanding lawyers nationwide - October 12th, 2017
  • New divorce forms unveiled - October 6th, 2017
  • Judge writes personal letter to teen after High Court battle - September 29th, 2017
  • Mental Health Saboteurs - September 22nd, 2017
  • Birch V Birch - September 8th, 2017
  • Congratulations, Rebecca Stewart passes her CILEx Level 6 in Client Care!
  • Resolution emphasises the need for more specialist financial advisers - August 25th, 2017
  • ONS - Population estimates for the proportion who are married or cohabiting by reference to age and sex in E & W
  • Court of Appeal rule forging contact order cannot be enforced - August 11th, 2017
  • Understanding loss as part of divorce - August 4th, 2017
  • Summary Case Law Update: X v X (application for a financial remedies order) [2016] EWHC 1995 (Fam)
  • Stacey accredited by Resolution - July 21st, 2017
  • Australian Divorce - Court of Appeal reject wife's bid for a larger settlement - July 14th, 2017
  • Just have a day - July 7th, 2017
  • Stuck in my marriage - June 30th, 2017
  • Emergency - a without notice injunctive order - June 23rd, 2017
  • Case law update concerning a mother’s application to relocate to the USA - June 16th, 2017
  • Reconciling as parents - June 9th, 2017
  • Stacey passes Collaborative Foundation training!
  • Life changing circumstances - May 26th, 2017
  • Bank of mum and dad - May 19th, 2017
  • Giving Evidence in a Children Act Case - May 12th, 2017
  • Are you more likely to divorce if you confide in female friends? - May 5th, 2017
  • Respond - do not react! - April 28th, 2017
  • Student loans - April 24th, 2017
  • Identity or not identity - April 20th, 2017
  • I don’t agree with what my spouse has said about me on his/ her divorce petition- Should I defend it?
  • Are judges the same as the rest of us? - March 31st, 2017
  • Domestic violence and child contact - can these work together?- March 24th, 2017
  • Child Arbitration- March 17th, 2017
  • A Step in the right direction for Cohabitees- March 3rd, 2017
  • Blue Monday- March 3rd, 2017
  • Blog on Matrimonial Survey Statistics - February 24th, 2017
  • What is it like to go to family court?- February 17th, 2017
  • Funding - February 10th, 2017
  • December 2016 - December 16th, 2016
  • Twas the night before Christmas… - December 23rd, 2016
  • Online Divorce Proceedings - January 20th, 2017
  • Case Law Update Concerning Overseas Pensions - January 13th, 2017
  • Make one resolution for 2017. Be Kind to Yourself - January 6th, 2017
  • Social Media in Divorce - December 2nd, 2016
  • Planning for Christmas following divorce or separation - December 9th, 2016
  • Should graduates be used to help Litigants in Person - December 30th, 2016
  • Talk To One Of Our Legal Experts

    01908 262680

    Talk To One Of Our Legal Experts

    01908 262680

    2019 Family: Beds, Bucks, Herts and Middx – South East

    Hawkins Family Law fields 'a very professional team that delivers a high-class service and has strength-in-depth from senior to junior level'. Managing director and team head Jo Hawkins provides 'clear and accurate advice and moral support through often testing times for her clients; she focuses on deriving the best long-term outcome for her client and other parties'. The practice has particular strength financial matters, including divorce and ToLATA proceedings. Other key figures include Loraine Davenport, who has strong collaborative law expertise and handles complex children cases and high-net-worth ancillary relief matters; Annabel Hayward, who focuses on complex financial provision and co-habitation matters; and Stacey St Clair.

    For more information please click here.

    2019 Family/Matrimonial – Milton Keynes and surrounds

    What the team is known for
    Boutique family law firm that punches above its weight in terms of high-value and complex matrimonial finance instructions relating to business assets, pensions and substantial property portfolios, including assisting with the handling of assets abroad. Also represents clients in the negotiation of wealth protection agreements and private law childcare arrangements. Fields a team trained in collaborative law and alternative dispute resolution.

    An impressed client says: "The team's personal service and individual care is a great asset,"adding that the lawyers are "always available to assist and understand the occasional need for immediate advice and guidance, providing a very reassuring service."

    For more information please click here.